However, I did like this book. Its well-written and easy to read. One really gets a sense of what life was like in the late 1800's in South Texas. The later part of the book deals with the impending lawsuit against the King Ranch. Did Richard King swindle his partner's widow out of what was rightfully her's? (about 7,000 acres of prime real estate). The widow's descendants sure think so. Can they win their claim over the power King Ranch? This is a complicated question to answer but the author digs deep into the story. The only bad part is that the case has not yet been settled, so there is no resolution to the engaging battel for money and land.
If you like Texas or western history, you should read this book.
There are several books on the King ranch. Some were sponsored by the owners. This is an independant and recent book by an important Texas author.
I found the first 2/3's of the book to be really intriguing and well written. Somewhere about 1/2 way I felt the beginnings of the drumbeat on the Chapman lawsuit against the King ranch. The last part of the book details the lawsuit as it updates the ranches history to modern times. In doing so the book loses its riveting advenuresome focus.
The author did his best in describing the early South Texas conditions and the development of this great Texas accomplishment. I really liked the descriptions of the raids by the Texas Rangers among others.
A Mr. Chapman was an early partner with Richard King on one of the main pieces of this huge ranch. The issue was rooted in a verbal partnership contract on land ownership. Chapman moves away, appears to forget about the property, then dies. The heirs, various decades later, sue for a hunk of the now successful ranch. You would think they would have played a more active role in a huge piece of property... like paying property taxes, approving invoices, etc.
I kept waiting for the author to side with the Chapman's on the lawsuit but that didn't happen. But somehow I just felt a prejudice underneath the surface that the author sided with Chapman. But in the end, the author tried to present both sides of the story. Although King and the Kleburgs are exonerated, the lawsuit left stains on their character after all the accusations.
I think the author didn't know how to present this lawsuit information. So he just dumped the information into the story trying to be as objective as he could... to let the reader decide which side had the better claim. It seemed that there was nothing but lawyers and mad people during the last 1/3 of the book. But in reality much of the growth of the King ranch occurs in the last 1/3 of the book -- particularly the acquisition of larger ranches overseas.
I would have given the book a 5 star if this lawsuit issue would have been toned down. I have no specific recommendations as to how anyone could do any better than what was presented. It was a history book and this aspect of the ranch needs to be told.
Richard King appears as a colorful, feisty Irishman who helps tame wild, hot, inhospitable South Texas. He weathers great set backs, fights the Mexicans stealing his cattle, rebuilds his torched home (33,000 sq. ft. now), sells his agricultural products by running the Yankee blockades during the Civil War, receives forgiveness from the Yankees after the Civil War, builds a great cattle ranch using Texas Longhorns. His heirs, the Kleburgs particularly, carry the ranch to new highs, including overseas. The ranch now is run professionally for the benefit of the heirs and other stockholders.
If you have not read any Texas history, you will like this book What I found striking were the problems that existed back in the 1800's are still with us today. I also was amazed how many pies Richard King had his finger into. He loved to form partnerships.
I give the book 4 stars for the great first part of the book.
John Dunbar
Sugar Land, TX
(Upper Gulf Coast, Texas)